Monday 1 June 2020

Self Hibernation Campaign - British Blockade Ambivalence

By Huw Carnaby Wright

Traditionally, Great Britain has used the power of the Royal Navy to apply tight blockade on her enemy’s ports, with the aim of crippling their economies by denying them access to raw materials and access to markets for their goods. The United States has a history of championing the rights of the Neutral States in any such conflict and has often challenged the right exercised by Great Britain to stop and examine the cargoes of neutral shipping.

These conflicts of interest were a factor in the causes of the War of 1812-14.

Ironically, today it is the United States that is attempting to apply a tight blockade of the so-called Confederate States and Great Britain that finds itself as the leader and champion of the Neutrals.

One might expect that Great Britain would seek to get revenge for previous challenges during the Napoleonic and Crimean War and look for opportunities to make life uncomfortable for the United States over her blockade policy.
 
Great Britain takes the Long View:
With the help of Mr. Charles Francis Adams Sr, I was recently granted an interview with Edward Adolphus Seymour, 12th Duke of Somerset and First Sea Lord of the Admiralty, at Brooks’s Club in St.James Street.

I asked His Grace why Great Britain had not created more fuss over the effects of the United States stopping and delaying ships to check for blockade runners.

When you have been around as long as us”, he replied, “one learns to take a ‘long term view’

The United States may well be applying a blockade today, but in view of our world-wide interests and possessions, combined with the strength of the Royal Navy, it is very likely that Great Britain will see the need to do so again tomorrow. We note with great interest the actions taken by the United States. 

As usually the ‘loudest’ voice amongst neutral States whenever Great Britain seeks to impose a blockade in time of war, any precedents set by US Navy by their actions in this conflict will be difficult to challenge should we determine to utilise them ourselves in the future.

Maybe this is why the French refer to Great Britain as "Perfidious Albion."